Reviews by SHU-FEN WUNG

I have checked several Web sites so far, my assessment of these sites is as follows:

1. URL: http://pharminfo.com/pubs/msb/msbcard.html

This site is published by Pharmaceutical Information Association. I have checked the category under the Cardiovascular Drug Reviews, the content is readable. It does provide some educational material in the content. Some current medication information is listed. They can also provide free articles to the readers, however, the readers still need to judge on the information requested. I would recommend this site to other student who are interested in knowing new medications or related research.

2. URL: http://homepages.enterprise.net/djenkins/ecghome.html

This is a site that is called ECG Library. In this site contains several standard 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) tracings. To my best of knowledge, the ECG printouts are accurate. The ECG waveforms are followed with diagnostic criteria, however, detailed knowledge and measurements are not presented. Therefore, it will be suitable for students who have basic knowledge about electrocardiogram.

3. URL: http://www.exploratorium.edu/xref/phenomena/cardiovascular-system.htm/

I first evaluated the cardiovascular system at this site, such as heart, vessel, flow, etc. There is no sufficient information for me to evaluate. No image available on the page. I then turn to the vision session to check "vessels of the eye", the description is not useful for the health care providers. This site is not attractive neither useful. I do not recommend this site to other students and, obviously, I would think this is fitting a negative assessment.

Shu-Fen Wung